The
G(irls) 20 Summit delegates, Globe and Mail article, resonates with me. There is no doubt that the equality
of women should be a joyous and wonderful thing celebrated by all women
everywhere! But what is this meeting of delegates missing? Focusing entirely on
women fails to address women’s equality and health. What? That’s crazy! Women
and girls are facing inequality resulting in health disparities—shouldn’t we
then focus on women? No, actually we shouldn’t.
Focusing exclusively on women is bad for the
health of men and women. It fails to provide the necessary variety of
perspectives about how gender interactions are contributing to inequality and
how this could be addressed in a comprehensive manner.
There are negative consequences of societal
gender expectations on all members of society. This includes the people, too
often forgotten (at least in North America) who don’t fall into this fabricated
gender binary. What about people who are not male or female? What does that
mean? You know, people who identify as something other than male or female,
including (but not limited to) gender queer people, transmales, transfemales,
and intersex people. These groups of people are often ignored completely and
face oppression to an exponential degree in comparison to women.
Imagine this. You’re suffering with mental
illness and searching for your identity in a society that doesn’t represent you
on the washroom label. You’re unsure of your gender identity because examples
of others like you are lacking and your existence is denied in innumerable
ways. How do you then go about treating your mental health issues (in a society
poorly structured to deal with mental illness in the first place) or for that
matter any of your other health issues that largely fly under the radar of most
mainstream doctors?
Many trans people face a complex web of
health issues (mental, sexual and physical health). This is further complicated
by the lack of research pertaining to trans people and plausible solutions to
the issues they face. A potential starting point for society to tackle this
challenge is by backing trans-supportive organizations to take the lead on an
international initiative with money and resources. Taking trans initiatives
international has potential to provide insights about how other cultures treat
trans people and how to improve our society.
But most importantly, we should be tackling
the problematic gender expectations and we should be doing it in an
all-encompassing/collaborative manner. That is, if we want to address
inequalities and related health disparities successfully. Or we could continue
attempting to separate inseparable social issues (gender inequality vis à vis
males) and members of society (female, male, or gender queer) to create an
illusionary solution for the illusionary “separate” issue.
--Holly Huntley
No comments:
Post a Comment