A recent Australian media report
describes an “innovative approach to mental health research”
This is a website where young people
who have received mental health care can rate what they think was helpful to
them. Good idea, but hardly new.
Our group in Toronto published an
academic study on this question in the 1990’s in the Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. And,
last year, the Institute for Families published its report of a national
consultation involving youth, parents and researchers from across Canada in
which the issue of what should be mental health research priorities in our
country. This report was the outcome of shared consultations that may help
identify national child and youth mental health research priorities for our
national and provincial health granting councils.
Regardless of pride of place with
the idea – it’s essential that young people and their families be involved in
the identification of what should be researched. Those who provide
clinical care and those who do research can only do what they do best when they
are informed by those they work with – patients. I can still remember when
one of my patients, a young girl with a manic episode told me that the mood
rating scale I had given her to fill out made no sense – because it did not
have a place to mark down depressed or low mood. When I changed the scale
with her help we made the discovery that manic episodes in young people
fluctuated widely in their mood levels. And when we applied this new
measurement technique to scores of other young people we were able to describe
for the first time, the now understood to be “classic” description of mania in
teenagers: mixed rapid cyclic manic episodes. And that is only one
example.
So what does this tell us? What
good health providers have known for centuries. listen to your
patients. Involve them respectfully as full partners in their
care. Learn from them.
--Stan
No comments:
Post a Comment