Once again the issue of media reporting of
youth suicide has raised its head. Upsetting reports of a B.C. teenager’s
suicide have flourished throughout the media. Details regarding the persons
actions, method of suicide and other intense details have been revealed and
given this teen a prolific profile in the media. The death has certainly taken
the country by storm and opened public’s eyes to bullying and teenage suicide.
But, some worry that these reports and continuous updates will affect youth in
similar situations and could result in copy-cats.
Over the past week, I had the opportunity to
touch on this subject where I discussed ways the media can report these
tragedies responsibly and provide the public with useful information. Click here to view an article from the Chronicle Herald.
These sensational reports of youth suicide
seem to be increasing throughout Canadian media. Evidence shows that this type
of reporting is linked to increased rates of suicide, especially in young
people. Some research data shows that there is a “dose response curve” with
suicide rates increasing proportionally to the amount of media exposure. On the
opposite side of the spectrum, data shows responsible reporting of suicide is
associated with decreased rates of suicide in young people. So why are
vulnerable young people being exposed to sensational media stories about
suicide?
A study conducted in the USA found that many reporters were not
aware of the degree of negative impact that sensationalized reporting of
suicide had on young people. However, it also showed that many of those
did know or did not believe that to be the case. Personal bias (or maybe
some other factors) trumped the data. I frankly, do not know which is
worse, not knowing or knowing and not caring.
Responsible reporting
includes, but is not limited to:
• Do not explain suicide stories, undue prominence and
avoiding sensational headlines
• Do not provide details of the method
• Give a balanced description of the victim (do not create a model for those considering the same act)
• Do not publish photos of the deceased
• Do not romanticize or provide simplistic explanations (such as bullying being the causation of suicide)
• Provide information about depression and substance abuse - as important factors in youth suicide
• Provide information on where to get help and examples of positive outcomes for young people in similar circumstances
• Do not provide details of the method
• Give a balanced description of the victim (do not create a model for those considering the same act)
• Do not publish photos of the deceased
• Do not romanticize or provide simplistic explanations (such as bullying being the causation of suicide)
• Provide information about depression and substance abuse - as important factors in youth suicide
• Provide information on where to get help and examples of positive outcomes for young people in similar circumstances
Is following these guidelines too much to ask?
Teens are known to be substantially impacted
by media. Youth who are struggling with suicide intent may be particularly
vulnerable. Most young people who are planning to take their own life are not
certain that they want to go through with the act. So, what can tip the
balance towards choosing life or death? There are many causes of suicide. Media
influences are one of the tipping points, which could push the young person in
one way or another.
I am not saying that the media should never
report on suicide, just that the reporting needs to be done responsibly.
Most suicides never get reported, meaning there is a choice the media is
exercising regarding on what suicides they will report and how they will report
them.
Can they not exercise this choice in a way
that does not cause harm to vulnerable people? The media does not have to
compromise their right to let the public know about important issues and
events, but they need to know that the matter, in which they choose, can be
part of the solution or part of the problem.
I have heard some argue that the public’s
right to know, trumps all. This may or may not be the case all the time.
Frankly, I wonder if those who make this argument have other factors at play. I
have noticed how commonly people can wrap themselves in the cloak of public
interest to cover up their self-interest. It is important to have this
conversation, but can we not have it in a positive and constructive manner?
When it comes to reporting on suicide, the media has the power to provide
useful information and hope, instead of a recipe for death.
-Stan
Below are some resources and associations who
have worked to underscore scientific evidence on the negative impact of
sensational reporting of suicide to urge the media to report on these issues
responsibly.
• Canadian Psychiatric
Association
• World Head Organization
• National Institute of Mental Health
• Media Contagion and Suicide Among Young People
• Media contagion and Suicide Among the Youth, American Behavioral Scientist, May 2003, vol. 46, no. 9, 1269-1284
• American Association to Suicidology
• American Foundation for Suicide Prevention
• Annenberg Public Policy Center
• Office of Surgeon General of the USA
• Centers for Disease Control
• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
• World Head Organization
• National Institute of Mental Health
• Media Contagion and Suicide Among Young People
• Media contagion and Suicide Among the Youth, American Behavioral Scientist, May 2003, vol. 46, no. 9, 1269-1284
• American Association to Suicidology
• American Foundation for Suicide Prevention
• Annenberg Public Policy Center
• Office of Surgeon General of the USA
• Centers for Disease Control
• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
No comments:
Post a Comment